Engineering Admissions Assessment (ENGAA), 2x interviews
Interview 1: motivation for studying course, technical question about personal statement then more technical questions Interview 2: questions/discussion about other areas of physics
Books of interview practice problems, practice interviews, going over personal statement
Practice ENGAA, NSAA and GCSE maths questions
Think out loud as much as possible
Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.
Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.
Test taken: Engineering Admissions Assessment (ENGAA)
Number of interviews: 2
Time between interviews: 2 hours
Length of interviews: 25 minutes each
Online interview: Yes
In my first interview, I was asked why I had applied for this course, and then a technical question about my personal statement. They then asked technical questions for the remaining twenty minutes, building on ideas from the A-level syllabus but asking questions beyond the scope of A-level. I found this interview really difficult, one of the interviewers was
The second interview had about the same structure but the questions were taken from other areas of physics. It felt a lot more collaborative, like a discussion, but I'm not sure whether that just came from the experience of the interview before.
I went through a few books of interview practice problems (I was actually asked two questions identical to ones in "Professor Povey's Perplexing Problems" in the interview) which seemed to really help and had
All the ENGAA practice papers as well as the physical
For any STEM subject, I think the most important thing is to think out loud as much as possible — there is no expectation that you'll be able to solve the problem without help, so you have to show the interviewers your thought process so they can let you know where you have gone wrong or where there's a gap in your knowledge.