2x interviews (1st interview 45 mins, 2nd interview 30 mins + 15 mins reading time); 1x test (1 hour)
Written test: compared case judgements; First interview: A-Level subjects, legal scenarios; Second interview: disucussed pre-reading, discussed unfamiliar area of law
Reading; keeping up to date with legal news; knowing personal statement; knowing course; masterclasses/open days
Didn't discuss my personal statement
Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.
Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.
I had my interview/ assessment day in the middle of December 2015 after a direct application to Robinson.
Students met me at Porters Lodge and took me to the waiting rooms and then to each room for my interviews and tests.
1)
2) First interview with a law professor and a law
3) Reading exercise followed by an interview to discuss it (15 minutes reading, 30 minutes discussing)
1) Written test (1 hour). I was given two judgements from cases and I had to compare them. You didn’t need to know any law, it was about reasoning and how you articulated your thought process and arguments. It wasn’t difficult to understand so don’t worry. It’s only an hour so it’s time rushed but as long as you write something which is literate and shows some independent/creative reasoning then it’s fine!
It changes every year I think. But same basic premise.2) First interview with a law professor and a law fellow (45 mins).
The first half focused on my A-Level subjects (English Lit, History, Maths, Biology) and what I’d enjoyed in my studies/further research. The second part was a few legal scenarios where I had to answer questions, and explain my reasoning/analysis. They were fairly simple (e.g. theft) and what you thought the legal consequences should be. They would then alter the scenario after you had answered to see how this affected your thinking and to see if you can respond to changes well.
3) Reading exercise followed by an interview to discuss it (15 minutes reading, 30 minutes discussing).
I was given a piece of legal material which was short and not too complicated and then also given a list of scenarios which you had to apply the legal material to.
In the interview (with 2 different law
Then they asked some other questions based on an area of law that you are not expected to know anything about. No prior knowledge needed they just want to see how your brain works and how you analyse situations and concepts.
I read: What about Law (Barnard/Goymour/Virgo); Letters to a Law Student (McBride); Eve Was Framed (Kennedy); Is Eating People Wrong? (Hutchinson). I also read legal press and news.
I made lots of notes of the topics that I’d discusssed in my personal statement (like feminism and the law and my
Just in general I made sure I new what was happening in the news and engaged with current events.
I went to a free Cambridge Law summer school at Trinity the year before and several law open days / masterclasses [Editor's Note: The university and colleges run free open days and workshops for most subjects. If you find the travel cost prohibitive, get in touch with the university / college as they can sometimes support students with the cost]. I also did a Debate Chamber summer school in law on a full bursary for a week in London.
If you look online there’s loads of stuff. Maybe get
Didn’t really discuss my personal statement at all.