Natural Sciences (Physical) @ Trinity, Cambridge in 2020

Interview format

Natural Sciences Admissions Assessment; 2x interviews.

Interview content

Interview 1: general personal statement based questions, chemistry and physics; Interview 2: physics and maths.

Best preparation

Be confident in topics you mention in your personal statement, learn to structure your thought process.

Test preparation

Do questions from past papers (step and CTMUA papers can also be used)

Final thoughts

Nobody gets everything right, and the interviewers are there to help you not trip you up!

Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.

Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.

Interview Format

Test taken: Natural Sciences Admissions Assessment (NSAA)
Number of interviews: 2
Time between interviews: a few minutes 
Length of interviews: 35 minutes each
Online interview: Yes

What happened in your interview? How did you feel?

We did talk about why I applied to Cambridge and why to Trinity, so even though it's often neglected in favour of academic questions, it is important to know the basic answers too!

In terms of question types, the majority of my questions involved drawing and then using diagrams of some kind, whether it was drawing out graphs for algebra and mechanics, or looking at physical diagrams of objects for kinematics questions, or even circuit diagrams. It's important to be able to draw these diagrams out on Zoom (preferably with a drawing tablet), and to practise drawing things on the computer beforehand - for online interviews, that is.

The interview is of course meant to challenge you, but besides the questions themselves, everything else was seemingly designed to put me at relative ease. The interviewers were all very friendly, the process was well-signposted and it was less nerve-wracking then I had been led to believe. With that being said, the questions were naturally not easy. I didn't manage to answer everything, but I think what was important was that I was always at least writing something down, and detailing my thought process - if you don't give the interviewers anything to work with, they can't help you reach the solution yourself, and they are trying to help you, I promise!

In terms of any differences between my interviews, besides the content of the questions being slightly different (the first being general questions based on the personal statement, then chem and physics, the next being physics and maths), there were no major differences between the two.

How did you prepare for your interviews?

The most effective preparation I did was going through example interview questions online, and learning to structure and lay out my thought process logically and clearly. It also helps if there is someone with you to act as the interviewer and help you through the problems given, although it is not essential by any means.

As well as practice questions, revision is of course also important. The two main areas of content I went over before the interview were a) the parts of the A-level course where I felt I was weakest, and b) parts that I touched on in my personal statement. Not all of my interview questions were relevant to the personal statement but several were, so make sure that you're knowledgeable about anything you have mentioned in it.

If you took a test, how did you prepare?

Do past paper questions and similar questions, step and CTMUA (Cambridge Test of Mathematics for University Admission) papers.

What advice would you give to future applicants?

- Practise past questions as much as possible.

- Make sure you know about everything you mention in your personal statement.

- Have a bottle of water for the interview.

- Try to remember that nobody gets everything right, and that your interviewers are there to help you, not trip you up.