NSAA; 2x interviews
Interview 1: A level style content; Interview 2: stretched further
Practice papers
-
Go over A level content
Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.
Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.
Test taken: Natural Sciences Admissions Assessment (NSAA)
Number of interviews: 2
Skype interview: no
Time between interviews: about 3 hours 15 minutes
Length of first interview: 30 minutes; Length of second interview: 30 minutes
The first interview began with some questions about where I went to school and if there were issues in teaching - presumably to also
The style of questioning was largely based on some sort of stimulus, such as a micrograph or a plotted graph, before I was questioned on related topics - overall there were about three major themes in each interview. In both interviews I was also asked about a particular idea from books I mentioned in my SAQ and personal statement, as well as a presentation I did at school. While for the first interview I felt I could answer most of the questions based on my knowledge at A-Level, the second interview definitely stretched me further. Though I did struggle, making sure to speak my thinking aloud meant the interviewers could understand my logic and thought processes, which is
I used all the practice papers available on the website, and read through the specification carefully to make sure I knew everything. BMAT section 2 questions are useful to help practice for the multiple choice questions - they are easier, but the style is the same.
Asking teachers if they can conduct a
This piece of advice has been incredibly overdone but it is so important - speak your thoughts out loud! Interviewers are genuinely more interested in how you think than what you know.