Interview 1: philosophical debate; Interview 2: personal statement, logic question
Wrote essays for sixth form philosophy essay competitions
Similar admissions test papers
The interviewers have dedicated their lives to philosophy and will have many valuable insights
Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.
Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.
Test taken: The Philosophy Test
Number of interviews: 2
Time between interviews: 2 hrs
Length of interviews: 30 mins
Online interview: No
In my first interview we debated whether there is a difference between science and religion. The interviewer’s role was mainly to find the limitations to my answers and challenge me to find better ones. I didn’t feel very nervous because I could tell that he wasn’t expecting me to find flawless answers but only to listen and respond to him thoughtfully.
In my second interview we talked about the difference between lying and telling the truth, theatre and reality. This was mostly like an exploration of these concepts together. I was also asked about an essay competition topic in my personal statement, what my argument was and if I had changed my mind since then. Then we moved on to a logic question, I was to read this and discuss the different possible logical outcomes. I could then ask a question in the end (feel free to make this a philosophical one that you’ve put a lot of thought into and for which you have your own response, it’s an opportunity to show your own exploration!)
I read and made notes on an important philosophical work in the field of metaphysics (Meditations, Descartes) and one in ethics (After Virtue, MacIntyre) then
The format is very similar to the
Read! You don’t have to read ten books, just two or three seminal works carefully, seeing where else they lead you. The interviewer is just an ordinary person! They may also have their preconceptions and limitations - don’t be afraid to debate with them and explore these questions together (no philosophical issue has a final answer yet that I know of). Having said this, they are also people who’ve dedicated their lives to philosophy and will have so many valuable insights. If nothing else, take this interview as an opportunity to learn and grow!