2 x 30 min interviews, over 2 days (1 per day)
Interview 1: analysed an unseen contemporary poem and discussed personal statement; Interview 2: analysed an unseen extract of non-fiction prose and discussed personal statement; both interviews included time at the beginning to annotate the unseen text
Found and analysed unseen texts from a range of time periods; brushed up on terminology; reflected on what I was reading at the time of the interview and what I thought about it
Completed practice papers; focused on close analysis of texts and writing timed essays
Try to relax and be yourself - think creatively and talk about your specialisms. Respond to challenges presented by the interviewer(s) and don't be afraid to change your mind. Also, don't worry if you don't know the correct terminology. Try to read something interesting around the interview period that you can talk about.
Remember this advice isn't official. There is no guarantee it will reflect your experience because university applications can change between years. Check the official Cambridge and Oxford websites for more accurate information on this year's application format and the required tests.
Also, someone else's experience may not reflect your own. Most interviews are more like conversations than tests and like, any conversation, they are quite interactive.
Test taken: English Literature Admissions Test (ELAT)
Number of interviews: 2
Time between interviews: A day (split over two days, one a day)
Length of interviews: Around half an hour. (Can’t quite remember)
Online interview: No
Both interviews had the same structure. You have 5 minutes outside the interview room to annotate an unseen text which is waiting for you. You then enter the room with two
In the first interview, I got a Sylvia Plath poem. They asked me what I thought about it and I analysed it without stopping to breathe for a while. She did not ask any questions. We then went on to the more general discussion. He glanced at my personal statement, saw the word drama and started asking about the place of plays in literature studies. They asked me about the book I was currently reading.
My second interview had a extract of non-fiction prose. I went in and discussed it which ended up lasting most of the interview, with both interviewers asking me questions about it. The discussion ended up spanning beyond just the text into more general themes and thoughts. At one point I forgot a term so I just asked them. Then they also asked me what book I was reading and why!
Preparing for an English interview is tough because the subject is so subjective and nebulous so, if you feel like you haven’t prepared enough, that’s really normal. I mostly prepared by finding and annotating a couple of unseen texts from a range of time periods. These could be poems or sections of prose (fiction and non-fiction). I also asked some of
I used practice papers and
My advice sounds silly but it would be to relax and try to be yourself. English is so subjective and creative, I think you get the best results not from spouting out someone else’s ideas but talking about your own. Don’t be afraid to keep talking animatedly about the text because that shows you love words and they want that. If they challenge you, take a breath, think and then respond. It’s ok to backtrack and admit ‘I hadn’t thought about it that way and/but…’. Also don’t freak out if you make a small technical mistake, just apologise or ask for the correct term. Make sure you are reading an interesting book! It doesn’t have to be Chaucer or Shakespeare to sound impressive, it just needs to be good quality and inspire you with ideas about it. I was worried before about not having the same favourite time periods as my interviewers, I know now that it really doesn’t matter. You are far better off talking about your specialisms than attempting to fit into theirs.